<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steven E. Brown, a Professional Law Corporation &#187; termination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.federal-law.com/tag/termination/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.federal-law.com</link>
	<description>Representing Federal Employees - EEO, MSPB, FECA, Disability Retirement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MSPB ORDERS OPM TO GRANT DISABILITY RETIREMENT TO SENIOR BORDER PATROL AGENT</title>
		<link>http://www.federal-law.com/mspb-orders-opm-to-grant-disability-retirement-to-senior-border-patrol-agent</link>
		<comments>http://www.federal-law.com/mspb-orders-opm-to-grant-disability-retirement-to-senior-border-patrol-agent#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSPB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merit Systems Protection Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federal-law.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Merit Systems Protection Board has reversed the decision of an administrative judge who, after a hearing, sustained the denial of the disability retirement application of an 18 year veteran of the US Border Patrol. The employee was injured and subsequently put on administrative leave for the investigation of non-work related misconduct. 
 
In denying the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">The Merit Systems Protection Board has reversed the decision of an administrative judge who, after a hearing, sustained the denial of the disability retirement application of an 18 year veteran of the US Border Patrol. The employee was injured and subsequently put on administrative leave for the investigation of non-work related misconduct. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">In denying the Agent’s initial application, OPM had stated that he had failed to show he was injured before he was placed on administrative leave. The Board ruled that the Office of Personnel Management<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>(OPM) should have considered whether the injured worker became disabled at any period during his employment, up to and including the period of time that he was on administrative leave. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"><span style="font-size: small;">The employee had introduced uncontested medical evidence showing that he had several herniated discs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The Board found that the claimant had</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"> “presented an overwhelming body of consistent and competent medical evidence that corroborate[d] his subjective complaints, and [established] that his medical condition [was] incompatible with either useful and efficient service or retention in his former position” (<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Henderson v. OPM</span></em>, Docket No. AT-844E-08-0071-I-1, August 4, 2008 at p.14).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The Board therefore directed OPM to approve the disability retirement application. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">The full decision can be viewed here: <a href="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/decision-8-4-08.pdf">decision-8-4-08</a></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt;"><a href="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/pics-0351.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-185" title="pics-0351" src="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/pics-0351-300x231.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="231" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.federal-law.com/mspb-orders-opm-to-grant-disability-retirement-to-senior-border-patrol-agent/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
