<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Steven E. Brown, a Professional Law Corporation &#187; USPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.federal-law.com/tag/usps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.federal-law.com</link>
	<description>Representing Federal Employees - EEO, MSPB, FECA, Disability Retirement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ECAB rules that Rural Carriers are covered driving to work</title>
		<link>http://www.federal-law.com/ecab-rules-that-rural-carriers-are-covered-driving-to-work</link>
		<comments>http://www.federal-law.com/ecab-rules-that-rural-carriers-are-covered-driving-to-work#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recent Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FECA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federal-law.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employee&#8217;s Compensation Appeals Board has ruled that a rural carrier who was in a car accident on her way to work was in the performance of duty as she was driving the vehicle which she intended to use to deliver mail on the date of the accident. The accident resulted in the amputation of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employee&#8217;s Compensation Appeals Board has ruled that a rural carrier who was in a car accident on her way to work was in the performance of duty as she was driving the vehicle which she intended to use to deliver mail on the date of the accident. The accident resulted in the amputation of the carrier&#8217;s leg. The carrier&#8217;s employer, the USPS, had argued that she did not have express permission to use that specific vehicle on the day of the accident. ECAB found that even if the carrier had violated the policy on getting permission before using her vehicle, such a technical violation would not remove her from the performance of her duties. ECAB ordered the District Office of OWCP to accept the claim.<br />
<a href="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/pcdocketno082216-9-25-09.pdf"> Download case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.federal-law.com/ecab-rules-that-rural-carriers-are-covered-driving-to-work/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Reassessment Process at the Postal Service</title>
		<link>http://www.federal-law.com/national-reassessment-process-at-the-postal-service</link>
		<comments>http://www.federal-law.com/national-reassessment-process-at-the-postal-service#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Law Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Reassessment Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postal Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federal-law.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Reassessment Process -Information for U. S. Postal Service Employees 
From: Steven E. Brown, A Professional Law Corporation
Voicemail: 1-805-496-9777; 1-800-USA-6927
 
 
If you are a Postal Service employee and have recently received a Notice like the one attached to this article (“Notice &#8211; Employees Without MSPB Appeal Rights” stating the Postal Service has no work available for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">National Reassessment Process -Information for U. S. Postal Service Employees </span></span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">From: Steven E. Brown, A Professional Law Corporation</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; text-align: center;" align="center"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Voicemail: 1-805-496-9777; 1-800-USA-6927</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">If you are a Postal Service employee and have recently received a Notice like the one attached to this article (“Notice &#8211; Employees Without MSPB Appeal Rights” stating the Postal Service has no work available for you), you have legal rights of which you may not be aware.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Taking steps to exercise and protect these rights may be quite important to your financial future.</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">As the Notice mentions, if your work limitations were caused by an industrial injury you are probably entitled to receive FECA (<span style="text-decoration: underline;">workers’ compensation</span>) benefits from OWCP for the time you spend at home when the Postal Service does not offer you any work.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Which form(s) you file, however, may impact the success of your claim for these benefits and/or the time delay before you start receiving benefits. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If you have received recent medical treatment for your industrial injury, of which OWCP is aware, we recommend NOT filing a CA-2a (recurrence of disability) form, but rather filing forms CA-7 (claim for compensation) and CA-7A instead.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It is usually more difficult to obtain payment of FECA benefits from OWCP when filing a recurrence claim using a form CA-2a, as opposed to just filing for benefits using a form CA-7.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Under the workers’ compensation law, when you are working limited duty due to an accepted industrial injury and the employer reduces or eliminates your work hours, you are by definition “totally disabled” for those hours/days and entitled to FECA benefits to cover the wage loss. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Our office has represented and counseled thousands of Postal employees in OWCP claims and can assist you in making sure you receive all the benefits to which you are entitled.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Once you begin receiving benefits from OWCP, you will likely be referred for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">vocational rehabilitation</span>. This process typically involves you being referred to a government-contracted vocational specialist who will then attempt to find you a job in the private labor market. The goal of the program is to provide some token training so that OWCP can identify a job in the private labor market that you can perform within your medical restrictions. Once they have identified such a job, they will provide some assistance in helping you obtain it. However, even if you do not get the job they have identified, they will still reduce your compensation based on a finding that you have the wage-earning capacity to perform that job. There are very specific rules for what kind of job can be found suitable for you. It must be within the injured worker’s medical restrictions, and the vocational rehab specialist must show that the injured worker has the necessary work experience or training to qualify for the position. The vocational rehabilitation counselor must also show that such a position is readily available near your home. Often, the vocational rehab counselor will identify a position that is not within the injured worker’s restrictions or qualifications. On the basis of such a determination, OWCP will often reduce compensation as if the injured worker took the position. Our office has represented many injured workers through the vocational rehabilitation process to ensure that the position identified for the injured worker is in fact “suitable” within the regulations and OWCP’s guidelines. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Assuming your disability is permanent &#8211; namely, it is expected to last for at least another year &#8211; you are also entitled to apply for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">early retirement under FERS or CSRS based on disability</span>.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The Notice you received from the Postal Service does not even mention this option.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Unlike workers’ compensation, disability retirement is designed as a permanent, lifetime benefit.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>If disability retirement is approved, you will be able to keep your federal group health and life insurance permanently, and pay the low federal group premium.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>If you are granted disability retirement, you can still work at another (non-federal) job. So long as you earn less than 80% of the current pay rate of your last occupied federal position, you can continue to receive your full retirement benefit from OPM. We have found over the years that many deserving disability retirement applications are denied due to error by OPM and/or due to improper documentation, which we can usually remedy either informally or at the hearing stage.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Even though many applications for disability retirement are denied by OPM, we have filed and obtained such benefits for over a thousand Postal and other federal employees. Every one of these applications our office has filed in the last several years has been successful.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">    </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">In both workers’ compensation claims and disability retirement applications, there are strict (and differing) <span style="text-decoration: underline;">requirements on the type of medical and other evidence</span> that must be presented. Most doctors find it helpful when their patient is represented by knowledgeable legal counsel, who can advise them what they must write in an appropriate medical report.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">   </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Although you may feel that the Postal Service’s decision to send you home is unjustified and may be motivated by <span style="text-decoration: underline;">disability discrimination</span>, you should be aware that there are several class action complaints currently pending at EEOC under which you may already be covered.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>If you are included in the class of Postal employees being represented by class counsel, you cannot “opt out” of that class action, and your rights with regard to disability discrimination will be determined in that case instead of in any individual EEO complaint you might file. On the other hand, if you are not covered by those class actions you retain the right to file your own EEO complaint about the discriminatory treatment. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The decision about whether to pursue a disability discrimination complaint is best made after consulting an attorney, but if you’re not sure we advise that you file your request for counseling (which is the first step in the EEO process) immediately to avoid missing the 45-day filing deadline.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"> <span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><a href="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/pdf_iconxs25.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-145" title="pdf_iconxs25" src="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/pdf_iconxs25.jpg" alt="" width="50" height="35" /></a></span></span><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><a href="http://www.federal-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/lf-usps-notice-of-no-work.pdf"><strong>lf-usps-notice-of-no-work</strong></a></span></span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE ABOUT ANY OF THESE MATTERS, PLEASE CALL US - 805-496-9777</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.federal-law.com/national-reassessment-process-at-the-postal-service/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
